On 22/04/2008, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There's a reason that ordinary users don't include /sbin: There can be > commands in /bin and /sbin with the same command name, but to do > slightly different roles. The root user will use the first one if > finds, the one in /sbin, which may allow them to do more than what an > ordinary user can do with the /bin command. We really ought to fix that :o) the issue is one of ordering more than actual inclusion in the path, i.e. the order should for /bin,/sbin (for each of /usr/local, /usr, /) for users and /sbin,/bin (likewise) for root. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list