Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
• From: Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:58:16 +0100
• In-reply-to: <16de708d0803251224m4923f64lc2c327d81f2d139e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Organization: Crocom Computer Systems
• References: <64b14b300803241233t7a69b620oc6fb5f3d9f7096e1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47E8E585.1090707@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47E8EBEF.3000407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fsb0nn$581$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8843055e0803250740m6dd169e2oad1519e8ef999c63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47E9130B.1080609@xxxxxxxxx> <47E91D69.10204@xxxxxxxxx> <47E94FAF.8010808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16de708d0803251224m4923f64lc2c327d81f2d139e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> >  > And the second you add a driver and/or XFS on to RHEL5 you are
> >  > now tainted and *UNSUPPORTED*.
> 
> >  Compared to Fedora where you are *UNSUPPORTED* at the offset?
> 
> is XFS even in the vanilla kernel?

  It is in vanilla 2.4 since December 2003. It is in current kernel
since september 2002 (kernel 2.5.36).

-- 
Tomasz Torcz

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: Les Mikesell

• References:
  • Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: Valent Turkovic
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: Bradley Pursley
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: John Summerfield
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: Mauriat M
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: Roger Heflin
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: Ian Chapman
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    • From: Arthur Pemberton

• Prev by Date: Re: tweaking printouts
• Next by Date: Re: tweaking printouts
• Previous by thread: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
• Next by thread: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread