Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim Alberts wrote:
Unfortunately, everything that is beneficial about Fedora comes with the 
price of 'not quite as well tested' status as RedHat or CentOS.
Honestly I feel like a backstabber by using CentOS because I've been 
with Fedora since before Fedora (RedHat 5.1 was my first Linux 
experience), and using CentOS is reaping the benefits with no contribution.
If you go back that far, you should realize that fedora is approximately 
like the old RH X.0 releases (X from 4 to 7) and Centos is like the old 
RH X.2 or X.3 releases (free download of the tested and more stable 
releases).  The numbering scheme is just different now.  The 
for-pay-only RHEL is the part that diverged from the old scheme.
Is there a way for Fedora to deal with more of the bugs before releasing and still remain a free distribution? I don't know how. If they do manage to do this, what would be the point of paying for RedHat?
You aren't supposed to be paying for the software in RHEL, you pay for 
the support service.
--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux