On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 01:14 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 13:45 -0800, Kam Leo wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:01 AM, MK <halfcountplus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Kam Leo hypothesized: > > > > No hypothesis. Just applying basic knowledge regarding the kernel to > > the problem that was described. > > > > > > You might be able to get improved performance by changing from the > > > > kernel's default I/O scheduler (CFQ). > > > > > > I switched the default to the "anticipatory" scheduler (leaving CFQ and > > > deadline built-in) because of xine lock-ups and that DEFINATELY did the > > > trick (2.6.22.6). > > > > Why was building a custom version of the kernel necessary? Didn't > > appending "elevator=as" work for you? > > I'm gonna give that a whirl after I plug through this pile of email! > Thank you for the hint, and I will let you know the result. Ric > > -- > ================================================ > My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: > "There are two Great Sins in the world... > ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity. > Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. > Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ > http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar > http://www.wayward4now.net <---down4now too > ================================================ > Sorry if I'm hijacking this thread, but I'm having trouble finding a solution to a source problem myself. I've got kernel-devel rpms installed for an i586, and a i686 kernel. Now when I try to build a module for my tv card it says it can't find .config file. So what I have is a 137.i686 kernel, and a 42.i686 source, plus a 137.i586. When it builds the module it looks for i686 source and fails. My question is: is there an i686 kernel-devel rpm for f8? I managed to build this module before, but I'm assuming there was no discrepancy between kernel and kernel-devel before. Cheers guys
