On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 16:02 +1030, Tim wrote: > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 22:14 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > All of the trivia quoted above is absolutely pointless with the > > exception that you want to use pointless trivia to proffer your > > knowledge. > > What you call "trivia" is factual information about what's involved. > You wanted me to back up my assertion, I've just explained all the > background information for you. Now you want to call the information > that explains it as pointless. Since you don't understand it, ask > someone else to confirm it for you. > > You remind me of lay people who, upon being advised by their doctor, who > actually know what they're talking about, say "pfft, what would they > know?" > > > If you actually knew of some commercial USB cable that was being sold > > that was incapable of handling USB 2.0, you might have actually > > offered information that was useful to someone. > > Do you realise how stupid it is to even ask that? How many hundreds of > brands may be available for purchase? How many different brands in > different places that aren't available at the other places? How many > that are fine, but aren't mentioned by someone, so people won't buy > them? How many of the same product are sold by different labels? How > many of different products are sold under the same label? ---- I was hoping that you could name just one commercially available USB cable that was not usable for USB 2.0 Craig
