Michael Schwendt escribió:
On 27/12/2007, Martin Marques <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
AFAIK, migration to git is on it's way.
But Git is not Mercurial. ;)
Any of the 2 are far better then CVS! :-D
Whether migration to Git is on its way, I can't tell. The Fedora Wiki
feels like a labyrinth and is slow to search. Switching Fedora Package
Ahhh, they are looking to migrate the wiki as well. :-)
MoinMoin is hell.
CVS to another SCM system is a controversy for several years. Whenever
I think you are confused.
The migration is for internal, but public, use. Specifically to maintain
revision of packages (spec files) of Fedora and maybe also of Redhat in
general.
You will always find packages of CVS, Subversion, git, Mercurial,
Monotone, Bazaar, etc. in Fedora so there shouldn't be any controversy.
it happens, it will make a small target group happy and will be
considered a nuisance by many others (especially those who've tried to
advocate their favourite SCM system). I hope Fedora leadership will
not unleash something half-baked onto the volunteers.
I hope I was clear.
