Re: CVS is dead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/12/2007, Martin Marques <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Michael Schwendt escribió:
> > On 27/12/2007, Martin Marques wrote:
> >> Karl Larsen escribió:
> >>>    Beginning now I planned to learn what CVS is and look for
> >>> instructions on wiki care and feeding.
> >> Please Karl. CVS is dead. Check Mercurial, which is great, has a book to
> >> learn how to use it, is distributed and has an excelent help:
> >
> > Still, CVS is very relevant to Fedora, since several of its
> > repositories use CVS. The source RPM contents are maintained in CVS,
> > for example.
> >
>
> AFAIK, migration to git is on it's way.

But Git is not Mercurial. ;)

Whether migration to Git is on its way, I can't tell. The Fedora Wiki
feels like a labyrinth and is slow to search. Switching Fedora Package
CVS to another SCM system is a controversy for several years. Whenever
it happens, it will make a small target group happy and will be
considered a nuisance by many others (especially those who've tried to
advocate their favourite SCM system). I hope Fedora leadership will
not unleash something half-baked onto the volunteers.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux