On Monday 24 December 2007, Les Mikesell wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >>> But, since gmail now permits imap access, why not go that route instead >>> of having to download/store the messages yourself? >> >> Cuz then I'd have to read lkml from firefox, whereas everything is now >> handled by kmail. Habits are hard to break. > >I'm missing something here. Why can't you send everything to gmail and >read from anywhere with any mailer that does imap? I'm still using >fetchmail and my own imap server but only because I set it up before >gmail supported imap. I have embarked on the journey to imap on 2 or 3 occasions here, but have totally failed to make kmail, running as a normal user, even find the imap repo. And its a possibility I didn't have that setup correctly either. There needs to be an 'Imap for big dummies' book written I guess. >-- > Les Mikesell > lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Just because the message may never be received does not mean it is not worth sending.
