Re: Seahorse vs Evolution ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 12:17 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:29 -0500, William Case wrote:

> However - after doing so, evolution in Fedora 8 had altered my configs
> in such a way as to make evolution in CentOS crash - had to wipe my
> evolution preferences completely. Fortunately I use imap so that was
> trivial. Furthermore, rhythmbox on Fedora 8 altered my playlists such
> that they crashed rhythmbox in CentOS 5 and I had to delete them and
> start over.
> 
> I really wish more open source developers would think about users who
> may end up needing to regress before they alter stuff that breaks
> earlier versions of their app. But that's a side issue.
----
yeah but an important issue...

Fedora 8 uses a newer version of gnome and evolution as you probably
figured out. Gnome and Evolution developers have a damn the torpedoes,
full speed ahead mentality, for good and for bad.

I wouldn't necessarily tar all open source developers with the same
brush used for gnome and evolution developers...I think that's unfair.

Craig


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux