On 01/12/2007, Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It gets sort of tiring to make unfaltering (to Fedora) comparisons to > Ubunbtu get rather tiring. There are advantages and disadvantages to > both systems. The fact that apt and synaptic are available in Fedora > makes the pup vs update manager debate sort of silly. > > One gaping hole in the Ubuntu is how to do the equivalent of adding a > repository. How for example would you add the equivalent of the Dell > repository to Ubuntu. It is not at all clear, at least to me. > I am willing to learn if someone is willing to explain. In Ubuntu two > conflicting procedures are presented. > > But the real truth is that the two systems are relatively equivalent. In > general Ubuntu uses versions that are generally behind those in Fedora. > > It often is pointed out that the update version feature of Ubuntu works > better than the update process in Fedora. But I suspect that is because > the programs available for installation are a much more a closed set. I'm a regular user of both OSes. I was just about to write up a description of why I choose one over the other before I came to my senses. DON'T FEED THE TROLLS!!! That said, if you ask a specific question I'll gladly give you a specific answer. By the way, Emacs sucks and VI rules. Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
