On Nov 12, 2007 5:22 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2007 7:48 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> It would be nice if an FC release could be supported for security issues > >> only for some reasonable length of time, maybe two years from iitial > >> release? > > > > By whom? > > > By people concerned to have this available. Fedora Legacy worked, but I > think it went back too far (I got updates for RH8 at one time) which > makes it too much work. Not to be rude, but are you going to do it? It seems that those who were originally interested in such lost interest > Does that sound reasonable for resources? The FL stuff would have been > great, I would have suggested this when it became obvious that the > project was no longer practical, and I could certainly keep a system on > an old release if that would be useful as a build playform. Don't get me wrong, longer lifetmes are a reasonable goal. But you can't just wave your hand and say "Fedora" should do it. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
