Re: F8 ETA?

• To: Rick Stevens <rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: F8 ETA?
• From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:59:37 -0500
• Cc: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• In-reply-to: <1193865299.9722.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <200710202210.52699.john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <645d17210710301511h10b76d5ag437a77b929724ea6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4727ADF7.8020705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200710311911.47457.adalbert.prokop@xxxxxx> <1193865299.9722.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 14:14:59 -0700,
  Rick Stevens <rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Actually, Fedora _is_ the beta stuff for RHEL.  There is no RHEL beta
> stuff...it's either RHEL or it's Fedora.  Example: RHEL5 is essentially
> Fedora Core 6.

You might want to note this announcement of a beta release of RHEL:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2007-July/msg00000.html

• References:
  • F8 ETA?
    • From: John Aldrich
  • Re: F8 ETA?
    • From: Jonathan Underwood
  • Re: F8 ETA?
    • From: Tim Alberts
  • Re: F8 ETA?
    • From: Adalbert Prokop
  • Re: F8 ETA?
    • From: Rick Stevens

• Prev by Date: Re: ever migrate from Fedora to Scientific Linux or CentOS?
• Next by Date: Re: ever migrate from Fedora to Scientific Linux or CentOS?
• Previous by thread: Re: F8 ETA?
• Next by thread: Re: F8 ETA?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread