On 10/7/07, Jacques B. <jjrboucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You are obviously not reading the same thing everybody else is > reading. But that is nothing new. Nowhere did I detect ANY > resentment or poor attitude in Ric's postings in this thread. But > your response certainly crossed that line. This is not your first > such venture into inappropriate responses. The regulars on this list > know you well enough by this point to partially filter many of your > postings. But you've crossed the line on this one. As you did once > before when you and I ended up having a private email exchange with > you although I was not the recipient of your attitude in that instance > either, just didn't appreciate how you had treated someone else. But > addressing it publicly this time seems necessary. ... > I apologize to those on this list who have no time for such rants. I > normally don't either. But at some point a limit is breached and > requires such a response. Your entire response was accurate and well said. Thank you for being the responsible third party who couldn't turn a blind eye to this. When I read Karl Larsen's original email, I cringed, thought of sending him a calm-down-reply, then moved on. I am glad you didn't do the same.
