Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
From: Chris Jones <jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:51:29 +0100
In-reply-to: <1189359247.8827.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -52 Charset: west-latin
Organization: University of Cambridge
References: <1189357869.8827.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7c1574a90709091026o6033197j6e28d5a13652ee77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189359247.8827.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Sunday 9 September 2007 6:34:07 pm Craig White wrote:
> good - thanks - it's rather annoying

You are using the 96xx legacy release though. I'm guessing the fix will only 
be in the mainstream (100.XXX) series ? Please someone correct me if I'm 
wrong, but I don't think the 96xx series will get the fix ?

Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
  - From: Lonni J Friedman

References:
- speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
  - From: Craig White
- Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
  - From: Lonni J Friedman
- Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
  - From: Craig White

Prev by Date: Re: NVIDIA drivers -- thoroughly confused ??
Next by Date: Re: NVIDIA drivers -- thoroughly confused ??
Previous by thread: Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
Next by thread: Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]