Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
• From: Chris Jones <jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:51:29 +0100
• In-reply-to: <1189359247.8827.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -52 Charset: west-latin
• Organization: University of Cambridge
• References: <1189357869.8827.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7c1574a90709091026o6033197j6e28d5a13652ee77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189359247.8827.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Sunday 9 September 2007 6:34:07 pm Craig White wrote:
> good - thanks - it's rather annoying

You are using the 96xx legacy release though. I'm guessing the fix will only 
be in the mainstream (100.XXX) series ? Please someone correct me if I'm 
wrong, but I don't think the 96xx series will get the fix ?

Chris

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
    • From: Lonni J Friedman

• References:
  • speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
    • From: Craig White
  • Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
    • From: Lonni J Friedman
  • Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
    • From: Craig White

• Prev by Date: Re: NVIDIA drivers -- thoroughly confused ??
• Next by Date: Re: NVIDIA drivers -- thoroughly confused ??
• Previous by thread: Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
• Next by thread: Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread