Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl

• To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
• From: "Lonni J Friedman" <netllama@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 13:01:09 -0700
• In-reply-to: <200709091851.29614.jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <1189357869.8827.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7c1574a90709091026o6033197j6e28d5a13652ee77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189359247.8827.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200709091851.29614.jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 9/9/07, Chris Jones <jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sunday 9 September 2007 6:34:07 pm Craig White wrote:
> > good - thanks - it's rather annoying
>
> You are using the 96xx legacy release though. I'm guessing the fix will only
> be in the mainstream (100.XXX) series ? Please someone correct me if I'm
> wrong, but I don't think the 96xx series will get the fix ?\

It will eventually.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
    • From: Chris Jones

• References:
  • speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
    • From: Craig White
  • Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
    • From: Lonni J Friedman
  • Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
    • From: Craig White
  • Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
    • From: Chris Jones

• Prev by Date: Re: Refresh Rate for Nvidia problem
• Next by Date: Re: Smtp auth in postfix
• Previous by thread: Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
• Next by thread: Re: speaking of nvidia binary drivers and beryl
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread