Peter Connolly wrote:
I probably misspoke. If it was Karl who attempted to create a blog
that didn't take off, then it is Karl that should take the hint that
his musings are not of general interest. Apologies.
On 8/26/07, *Richard England* <rlengland@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:rlengland@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The "indictment" that I should listen to.....smooth phrase...
meaning I
should not have continued the thread?
No apology necessary, Peter. Mail and mail groups are like that. Even
when threaded, attributes get confused. If Karl has started a blog, he
has not announced it here.
As a matter of fact, if he were adding to a blog, it might be something
I'd check in on, occasionally. I would expect stream of consciousness
there and I would know that all the old messages are in one place, on
the blog....and it could be interesting to follow his built up of a new
system. The things he finds might well be things I might encounter. I'm
always ready to learn from another persons experience.
~~R
