On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 06:01 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 14:42 -0700, Alan M. Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 15:20 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote: > > > I have learned a lot today and it is all bad. Let us assume > > the udev > > > update I got is what ruined my printing. The obvious thing to do is > > > delete the update. But you can not do that. > > > > No. The obvious thing to do is to roll back to an old udev. You would > > do > > this by grabbing an old version rpm then replace the new (updated) > > package with the old one. > > > Ok, I'll bite. People keep talking about downgrading a yum install. I > have never seen how to do this? The old yum rpm is no longer in the > database that I can find. I only said that the opposite of updating was rolling back (or "downgrading"), not deleting. If "update" my bicycle and I don't like the new bike, then I want my old one back; I don't want to "delete" my bike. Downgrading can be made much easier. I'm not sure why things aren't configured that way by default. But that wasn't the point of my post. > In any case it is not a udev problem. The updated cups does not support > parallel printers. Is that not a bug? Probably is. (I certainly never said it wasn't.) But I'm not talking about that, either.