On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 09:20:20AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:40:31PM +0200, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> > My impression is that vpnc is much more CPU demanding than
> > Cisco's VPN client.
>
>
> On the other hand, it's less likely to cause kernel panics and won't taint
> your kernel. Take your pick.
>
>
> Really, don't do heavy compute jobs while using the VPN and you'll be fine.
I use vpnc a lot, and I've never NOTICED that it hogs the CPU. And the
fact that it runs entirely in "user space" is a feature, as far as I"m
concerned.
--
---- Fred Smith -- fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----------------------------
But God demonstrates his own love for us in this:
While we were still sinners,
Christ died for us.
------------------------------- Romans 5:8 (niv) ------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpHgE8o2QuIe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
