On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 02:52 +0000, Thufir wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:30:31 -0700, David Boles wrote: > > > >> I see what you mean. That would be nice, but I'd simply rather have > >> more packages in fedora yum and better integration with other yum > >> repositories, like one-click to add livna, for example. > >> > >> Given limited resources, that's my preference, at least. > >> > >> -Thufir > >> > >> > > Fedora is in the USA and they can not provide that information about > > 'third party sites'. Or even acknowledge that they exits as I understand > > it. So I greatly doubt you will get a click 'n' go link from within > > Fedora. ;-) > > I don't think that it has to do with being the US or not, it relates more > to Fedora only distributing GPL packages. Me thinks you are missing the point: It is lawful for sites in the US to provide pointers to sites hosting software which is lawful to distribute in the US. With RH being a US based enterprise, RH/Fedora can not provide such pointers, no matter what the causes are for why certain SW is being "outlawed in the US". Ralf
