Re: Here are some of my ideas for Fedora 8 and Fedora 9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 02:52 +0000, Thufir wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:30:31 -0700, David Boles wrote:
> 
> 
> >> I see what you mean.  That would be nice, but I'd simply rather have
> >> more packages in fedora yum and better integration with other yum
> >> repositories, like one-click to add livna, for example.
> >> 
> >> Given limited resources, that's my preference, at least.
> >> 
> >> -Thufir
> >> 
> >> 
> > Fedora is in the USA and they can not provide that information about
> > 'third party sites'. Or even acknowledge that they exits as I understand
> > it. So I greatly doubt you will get a click 'n' go link from within
> > Fedora.  ;-)
> 
> I don't think that it has to do with being the US or not, it relates more 
> to Fedora only distributing GPL packages. 
Me thinks you are missing the point: 

It is lawful for sites in the US to provide pointers to sites hosting
software which is lawful to distribute in the US. With RH being a US
based enterprise, RH/Fedora can not provide such pointers, no matter
what the causes are for why certain SW is being "outlawed in the US".

Ralf




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux