Tim wrote: > Kelly: >>> I'd agree, except for the identity of the company proposing >>> "interoperability". Microsoft doesn't have a history of that; >>> rather, it has a history of EEE and lock-out, and considering Windows >>> is one of their two big cash cows, I do not believe for a second that >>> they really want interoperability. I suspect what they'd prefer is a >>> method of forcing people from Linux to Windows, but not vice-versa >>> (they did the same thing with O/S2). > > Les Mikesell: >> Of course that's what they want. Why does that matter? > > Just so long as they don't succeed (at the "forcing," or just continuing > to make life very difficult for everyone else). > Give me one example of how they can make my life difficult. Have fun ;-) Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip
