Kelly: >> I'd agree, except for the identity of the company proposing >> "interoperability". Microsoft doesn't have a history of that; >> rather, it has a history of EEE and lock-out, and considering Windows >> is one of their two big cash cows, I do not believe for a second that >> they really want interoperability. I suspect what they'd prefer is a >> method of forcing people from Linux to Windows, but not vice-versa >> (they did the same thing with O/S2). Les Mikesell: > Of course that's what they want. Why does that matter? Just so long as they don't succeed (at the "forcing," or just continuing to make life very difficult for everyone else). -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ rm -rfd /*^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Huname -ipr 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 i686 i386 Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7. Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
