Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
Skunk Worx wrote:
[snip]
Kudos to RedHat for sticking to their guns. Unix predates MS-anything
by decades so it's all kind of humorous.
I'm not sure this is true, but even if it were, Linux is not UNIX.
What we commonly call Linux is actually Linux (the kernel) which
doesn't predate MS products, and GNU, which, as we all know, means
GNU is Not UNIX. So, Unix dates have nothing to do with this discussion.
Actually, my recollection is that I started using Linux 0.12 some time
in the 1992 time frame. About this time Windows 286 and Windows 386
were the MS offerings along with their DOS 3.x, 4.0x products. UNIX had
been around quite a long time at that point. I had been using versions
Like 1970s time frame.
[snip]
While the exactness of the OP's statement is probably hard to prove
beyond the shadow of a doubt, I do believe his statement that "Unix
predates MS-anything" is generally true.
MicroSoft produced stuff for CBM machines at approximately the
time they were introduced. In any case, Unix and Linux have
nothing to do with each other, except that GNU is modelled
after Unix, and is commonly included in the term "Linux".
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
