On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:13:53 +1000 Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > | Right up there with using non-standard pipe symbols for your quoting > | character, perhaps? > > They don't make things not work. I just find them easier on the eyes > than the jagged > chars. Non-standard quoting characters break the colorizing that some mail clients do to set off various levels of reply. > Given the amazingly high forgery rate of spam headers, does this > really achieve anything? These day? I don't know. I haven't seen that particular stunt in some number of years, actually. The NOSPAM trick here just reminded me of that. Old home week and all that, you know. > I still maintain it breaks the abuse channel > for the sending of genuine complaints. How so? What could constitute a more genuine abuse complaint than "here's some spam and it originates from the headers in this message"? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
