On 6/2/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Looks awesome, works awesome. It's one of the most flawless and simple >> >> Linux installs I have had in a long time, even with the somewhat >> unusual >> >> setup I have. >> > >> > You are lucky. >> > So am I, so far. >> > >> > However, no-one knows what proportion of Fedora users >> > meet a problem with installation. >> > >> > It is a serious weakness of Fedora, in my view, >> > that there is no proper attempt to get feedback on this issue. >> > (Bugzillas are only used by a tiny proportion of users.) >> >> Since this is just guess work what would you consider a "proper" attempt >> to get feedback on thousands of packages other than bugzilla,irc or >> mailing lists? > > At least, people from RedHat could answer questions like "in which > component should I report this bug?"... Anaconda obviously. Did you ask anywhere? I don't see any reason this should be focused on one organization. Anyone who needs to know something should ask a question and those who know should answer it.
Sure, I did ask: http://marc.info/?l=fedora-list&m=118073448823429&w=2 Anaconda was not obvious to me.
> Perhaps, RedHat wants to keep people silent regarding the faulty > installation dvd that they have created. Bad assumption with no basis. Lots of people use bugzilla to request features, file bug reports or even do package reviews.
I was not fully assertive; notice that I used the word "perhaps". Paul
