On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 11:54 -0600, Robin Laing wrote: > http://www.apparent-wind.com/gmt-explained.html > A quick search shows that GMT isn't accurate and that the definition > for GMT can very by up to 0.9 seconds. Though, it's related to the rotation of the planet, which is necessary for some fields. UTC is a consistent time, and that's necessary for some other fields. -- (This box runs FC6, my others run FC4 & FC5, in case that's important to the thread.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
