Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/9/07, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> On Monday 09 April 2007, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400,
>>> linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> No it has something to do with the function not being
>>>>> open source or something like that. It was on another
>>>>> mailing
>>>> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally include".
>>> It is stripped because it was there from the source.
>>> Can't legally include is just their opinion.
>> Please point me to the source on the OpenOffice website.
>> I can't seem to find it.
>>
>>> The cool thing is I can override their opinion and put
>>> it back the way the developers provided it for all to
>>> use as we decide too.
>
> The OpenOffice.org package on the web site will do things
> that can't be done in the Fedora version.  Even as early as
> the 1.0.3 version (I have a copy on Knoppix 3.3 live CD)
> from the OOo site had this function in it.

You didn't answer the question.  What you are saying is not in dispute.

Please point me to the *source* on the OpenOffice website (preferably in
srpm format, but tar.gz will be fine) to download.



http://download.openoffice.org/index.html

--
Fedora Core 6 and proud


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux