Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:32 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 23:20 -0400, linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The package on the web site will do things 
> > that can't be done in the Fedora version.  Even as early as 
> > the 1.0.3 version (I have a copy on Knoppix 3.3 live CD) 
> > from the OOo site had this function in it.
> > 
> You have yet to tell us what these missing features are, or indeed what
> to Google for. I, for one, would be interested to know what I as a user
> of this software am potentially missing.

Nevermind. Andy Green posted about the MSFT patent thread article soon
after this mail was sent. (Thanks, Andy!)
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux