Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, April 10, 2007 12:48 pm, linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400,
> linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > No it has something to do with the function not being
>> > open source or something like that. It was on another
>> > mailing
>>
>> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally include".
>
> It is stripped because it was there from the source. Can't
> legally include is just their opinion.
Exactly, and yet another nail in fedoras coffin
> The cool thing is I can override their opinion and put it
> back the way the developers provided it for all to use as
> we decide too.
Yes, and time to consider other versions of Linux that dont mutilate :) or
maybe I'll just stick to solaris at home
> --
> If the word following begins with
> a vowel, the word you want is...
> to read the rest of this, go here
> http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/a.html
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>


-- 
Regards,
Res



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux