Re: Ubuntu 1, Fedora 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 1, Fedora 0
From: "Paul Osunero" <esiex3@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:39:42 -0500
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=A92aSFMlvIaAtYG4My5rr6yCNSCYrgk1TZAPmxc4PLMpHysO6SDywultb7rR9Ar6pyymCO8slIylAfsnJGCfwUcULV5m+oiTojN8tBck+Xyz9QrJS+t4IO8Cm/utOrhM832xw521RvwWN3BHGNWLIe6FR7Wdl2Z7/xmFpbch+UE=
In-reply-to: <20070317183222.86551.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <deb31e820703171024o2b396078hc1a24d839ae54291@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070317183222.86551.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Also, on a side note. Linux Mint and *BuntuSpire have
Ubuntu as a base and include what Ubuntu doesn't
should not they be a little bit ahead of Ubuntu.

Ubuntu does get CNR pretty soon you know... so they get completely legal codecs soon.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ubuntu 1, Fedora 0
  - From: Ingemar Nilsson

References:
- Re: Ubuntu 1, Fedora 0
  - From: Tin Tin
- Re: Ubuntu 1, Fedora 0
  - From: Antonio Olivares

Prev by Date: Re: Ubuntu 1, Fedora 0
Next by Date: Re: Packages not signed?
Previous by thread: Re: Ubuntu 1, Fedora 0
Next by thread: Re: Ubuntu 1, Fedora 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]