> Sounds like Fedora isn't the distribution for you. You should check out > CentOS (specifically, the upcoming CentOS 5), which is ultimately derived > from Fedora but with a much longer lifespan for each release. (Years > instead > of months.) Yup, I'll go with that also. Fedora Core is more made for new technologies. Testing many new applications. Nice for techies :). But for updates, use CentOS or RHEL. That's for stability. > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 05:44:33AM -0700, jdow wrote: >> Bingo - updated. The Fedora folks are worse than the Microsoft folks on >> this >> one. Simple fix on a relatively (to W2K) OS and nobody made it. At least >> the > > FC4 isn't supported.That's very clear. > >> So in the spirit of being a nice woman I figured I'd pass along what I >> did >> to update an FC4 installation I have not had time to move upwards to >> something that'll crash more often because it's newer. (I am NOT happy >> with FC5 on my laptop.) > > Sounds like Fedora isn't the distribution for you. You should check out > CentOS (specifically, the upcoming CentOS 5), which is ultimately derived > from Fedora but with a much longer lifespan for each release. (Years > instead > of months.) > > -- > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >