Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 18:20 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
IMO, mounting by "volume name" is a very poor way to do things.
Okay, you have some program, let's call it SuperThing. It has a
collection of discs because that's how it comes. At some stage it wants
its disc one, later on it wants its disc two, and so on.
Should I ever encounter that circumstance,
I would prefer to do the mounts myself by hand, and respond to
a prompt.
[snip]
That's fine for local data. Not much good for something on a separate
removable media (e.g. last weeks back-ups).
My backups don't have the problem of prompting for disc 1, disc 2,
etc, and even if they did, I would rather supply either a configuration
file, as noted above, or respond to a prompt about what device
to find them on, and let the program simply do regular mounts
and dismounts, or mount them by hand.
Not by "volume".
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
