On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:12 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:53 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > If I had infinite time I could search the list of 100's(?) of config > > items on the list at that web site to find the one that would do what > > this does. I asked this list at least four times how I could see and > > change the items in the Download window and until recently no one could > > answer. Admit it did you know that this config item would do this? I > > would bet not. But many times on this list people have asked how they > > could configure their firefox plugins and handling application. If you > > don't know about this config option you are flying blind. I don't know > > why anyone would distribute a browser configured this way. Mozilla knows > > better since this defect is not present in mozilla. It seems to me if > > this was pointed out to the Fedora they would see the wisdom of changing > > this configuration > ---- > I'm not sure that I agree with your conclusion but I definitely think > that the way to go about this is to create a bugzilla entry as a request > for enhancement (which you did), and use this list (and perhaps others) > to ask others to sign on to your RFE by linking the bugzilla number and > if the ground swell is sufficient, it is likely going to happen. > > Craig > Ok it is bug # 227405. I did not mark it RFE . That was a mistake but it is clear from the text of the bug that is what I want. Anyone who agrees that the configuration of firefox should be changed in the way indicated please add your 2 cents to the bug report. -- ======================================================================= To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk. -- Thomas Edison ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
