Re: Security Updates -- Are they necessary in Linux for user?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Today Mikkel L. Ellertson did spake thusly:

Tim wrote:
Tim:
Related to that, you can ignore or remove things that you're not going
to use.  e.g. If you're never going to use OpenOffice.org, you can forgo
the updates for it, or even remove the thing entirely.

Les Mikesell:
The simple minded approach is to just 'yum update' once a week or so
and take everything it suggests.

Though, the first time you do it, you're presented with a very large
number of updates.  Trying to do that piecemeal can be difficult, thanks
to all the dependencies, and YUM's default configuration not to keep
cached files.

Otherwise, it would be simpler to just keep on downloading stuff, until
you can do the updates.

Doesn't YUM keep the the downloads that it has not installed because
of dependencies, or other problems? In the past, when packages could
not be installed because of conflicting files, the packages were
still in the cache.

Default is not to cache files. Change:
keepcache=0
in /etc/yum.conf

--
Scott van Looy - email:me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | web:www.ethosuk.org.uk
site:www.freakcity.net - the in place for outcasts since 2003
PGP Fingerprint: 7180 5543 C6C4 747B 7E74  802C 7CF9 E526 44D9 D4A7
      -------------------------------------------
      |/// /// /// /// WIDE LOAD /// /// /// ///|
      -------------------------------------------

It is a hard matter, my fellow citizens, to argue with the belly,
since it has no ears.
		-- Marcus Porcius Cato


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux