Re: How NSA access was built into Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 09:29 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 20:10 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 08:21 +1030, Tim wrote:
> > > Tim:
> > > >> For some people, having it running certainly causes a performance
> > > >> loss. Whether that's down to SELinux, itself, or the logging, I've
> > > >> not experimented with.
> > > 
> > > Lyvim Xaphir:
> > > > Have you been able to get around the lag with selinux=0? 
> > > 
> > > Not that I want to be rude, but what other method do you think I used to
> > > determine it was faster without SELinux?
> > 
> > 
> > SElinux has three modes; enforcing (or "active"), warning (or
> > "permissive") and "disabled". From what you wrote here I glean that
> > you've only compared "active" with "disabled", the two modes you are
> > familiar with.  My question was really directed at getting to know if
> > you had touched on permissive mode with regards to performance.  I just
> > "assumed" that you would know that, which was my error.
> 
> Permissive mode shouldn't be any different than enforcing mode wrt
> performance, aside from possible differences in what audit messages get
> generated and the resulting load on the audit system.
> 
> > I understand that "echo 0 > /selinux/enforce" switches an active
> > "enforcing" system to permissive mode, and "echo 1 > /selinux/disable"
> > is supposed to be equivalent to disabled entirely.  I was also thinking
> > that it would be interesting to observe how SElinux behaves with regard
> > to performance when the echo method is used to disable, as compared to
> > selinux=0.  Just for the heck of it.  Yes I know they are supposed to be
> > the same, but still experimental verification couldn't hurt.
> 
> selinux=0 is better since it can be detected by SELinux immediately
> during initialization and preclude any registration of hooks or
> allocation of memory by SELinux.  /selinux/disable has to retroactively
> unregister the hooks.  Of course, in the end, both should yield the same
> runtime performance since the hooks are no longer registered, but there
> could be slight variances.
> 
> -- 
> Stephen Smalley
> National Security Agency


I got this red button from Staples for Christmas, with "easy" on the top
of it.  Here, let me press it...

"that was easy"


:)

LX
-- 
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Off Topic or Political Discussions:
http://mandrakeot.mdw1982.com/
http://www.mdw1982.com/mailman/listinfo/mandrakeot

"Character is what you do when nobody's looking." - J.C. Watts
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux