On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 11:56 +0000, James Wilkinson wrote: > jdow wrote: > > Besides, WTF good is Bayes with image spam? > > Actually, I find that SA's Bayesian engine is pretty good at spotting > the random text they put in most image spam. With a few extra points for > technical stuff, most of it goes directly to the spam folder, and the > rest to the "unsure" folder with fairly high scores. > > James. I guess I have to point this out with a little bit of trepidation. But if you have an unsure folder you are probably using SpamBayes not Spamassassin. -- ======================================================================= Help! I'm trapped in a Chinese computer factory! ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
