jdow wrote:
> Besides, WTF good is Bayes with image spam?
Actually, I find that SA's Bayesian engine is pretty good at spotting
the random text they put in most image spam. With a few extra points for
technical stuff, most of it goes directly to the spam folder, and the
rest to the "unsure" folder with fairly high scores.
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | DON'T be put off by "horror stories" spread by others.
aprilcottage.co.uk | People who talk about death and serious injury are very
| rarely the ones who have actually suffered such things.
| -- Adrian Plass
