Re: Public keys - again.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Public keys - again.
From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:31:02 +0000
In-reply-to: <200612141555.05315.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200612141112.56983.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1166105095.5760.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200612141555.05315.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.5

On Thursday 14 December 2006 15:55, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> Is rpmforge a later version of freshrpms?  If so, I'll have to look again
> for the release.rpm and key file for that.
>
I see it's not.  The Dag/Dries situation got me confused :-)

Anne

Attachment: pgpvpqM8FWF8j.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Public keys - again.
  - From: Anne Wilson
- Re: Public keys - again.
  - From: Craig White
- Re: Public keys - again.
  - From: Anne Wilson

Prev by Date: Accessing svn repository on windows machine from linux machine
Next by Date: Re: sdtv reception
Previous by thread: Re: Public keys - again.
Next by thread: Re: Public keys - again.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]