On 12/14/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Matthew Saltzman wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Charles Tuckey wrote: > >> On 12/13/06, Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, help in gnome relies on some libs that are included with Fx. The > ideal solution would be to break the gecko-libs out of Fx and make Fx > depend on them. Then other things that require gecko-libs could install > them without installing all of Fx. > > You might bugzilla this suggestion and see what the packager's reaction is. > Dont file bugzilla reports on this. Gecko engine is already planned to be splitted out sometime in the future but its not a mature effort yet. It will be done when it is ready. See http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XULRunner for more details.
Sounds good. While I wait I will install firefox 64. charlie
