On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 17:11, Alan wrote: > > > who struck a deal with Microsoft which is borderline on the GPL. > > > > Isn't 'illegal to distribute' something that is decided by > > the copyright/patent owner, not some slightly interested > > bystanders? > > For the kernel I *am* a copyright holder. And how is what you are doing any different than Ballmer's claims that the kernel infringes on Microsoft's patents? I guess I would find it somewhat amusing if a Linux distribution omitted the kernel and made you download your own copy separately due to the FUD surrounding it from all directions. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
