Re: OT: Novell Is Not SCO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 12 November 2006 11:43, Craig White wrote:
>On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 12:13 -0700, Phil Meyer wrote:
>> taharka wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 09:10 -0700, Craig White wrote:
>> >> for a completely different perspective...
>> >
>> > Yes, I've read that one. Also, plenty of different perspectives in
>> > the comments section at that link. Not much activity though since
>> > Nov 5th.
>> >
>> >> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061102175508403
>> >>
>> >> Craig
>> >
>> > taharka
>> >
>> > Lexington, Kentucky U.S.A.
>>
>> Still fairly polarized, but still worth the read:
>>
>> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/20061109a.html
>>
>> And PJ (groklaw) has a story about it today.
>
>----
>and likewise, samba developers took a position today
>
>http://news.samba.org/announcements/team_to_novell/
>
>Craig

Knee-jerk reaction by me would have been to demand that samba and cifs be 
removed from their distribution, but I see it didn't quite come to that, 
so its just so much hot air.  Unfortunately...

-- 
Cheers, Gene


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux