Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:12:43 +0000 (UTC)
References: <16de708d0611012109s67f069bj196bba40f602d781@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20061102T170329-793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <eid6cj$sim$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8843055e0611020847p66b9aab0vced9360135dc26fc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <eid9vd$c90$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Timothy Murphy <tim <at> birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie> writes:
> Judging by the number and volume of KDE updates on FC-5 and FC-6,
> there seem to be plenty of Fedora developers working with KDE.

All these updates have actually been issued by a single maintainer. Than Ngo is 
really doing great work, thanks! :-)

        Kevin Kofler

References:
- Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
  - From: Arthur Pemberton
- Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
  - From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
  - From: Mauriat Miranda
- Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
  - From: Timothy Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: Oopses with kernel 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5
Next by Date: Re: Lost anti-aliasing
Previous by thread: Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
Next by thread: Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]