Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>  that
> I could access "Suspend" or "Hibernate" in the Gnome menu, but I
> couldn't easily find them in KDE on FC (at least on FC5).

I agree. I love KDE and find gnome boring, but it is little things like this 
that might KDE inferior on FC. The FC s develop nice scripts for 
hibernation/suspend (all the menu items in gnome do is run pm-hibernate and 
pm-suspend, as far as I can tell) but only bother to tie them into the gnome 
dsktop. How hard would it be to just add a few menu items to KDe as well. Not 
very.

Similarly for compiz, it works fine under gnome, they even made a menu item to 
activate it, but again didn't bother for KDE :(

Heres hoping stuff like this gets done better once KDE is in extras ?

cheers Chris

>
> Obviously Fedora puts much more focus in Gnome than KDE. I am not
> complaining, it is just a fact.
>
> I am a Gnome user by the way.
>
> -Mauriat

-- 
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| Dr Chris R Jones         work   : +44 (0)1223 337324         |
| HEP Group  (rm 882)      fax    : +44 (0)1223 353920         |
| Cavendish Laboratory,    home   : +44 (0)1223 510711         |
| Madingley Road,          mobile : +44 (0)7723 327477         |
| Cambridge, CB3 0HE       email  : jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux