Alexander Dalloz skrev:
Erik P. Olsen schrieb:
Thanks, so FQDN means that there MUST always be at least one dot in
the hostname. What if I use epo.dk, which is a public domain owned by
me, instead of your example olsen.intra? Does that cause any conflict?
To your first question: that a FQDN has at least one dot is a result of
its definition. Chris already gave a link. In addition
http://www.unix.org.ua/orelly/networking/sendmail/ch21_02.htm
If you use a valid, because public resolvable domain name there is
always the risk that as effect a service request - here mail routing -
goes a different route than you would expect and want to. I mean, if the
resolvable domain name has DNS records poiting to different locations.
To be specific: Sendmail does MX lookups and a query for your "epo.dk"
domain gives a valid result:
$ host -t mx epo.dk
epo.dk mail is handled by 10 webhotel3.webhosting.dk.
Sure, you can try to avoid such pitfalls by doing specific setup
"tricks". But isn't it easier to simply use a namespace for your LAN
where there is no risk it would be resolvable for any public meaning?
Yes, I agree and I think I have it all straight now.
And thanks to everybody who has participated in helping me out.
--
Erik P. Olsen, Civilingeniør, MSc
Solsortvej 30, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: +45 38346480, Fax: +45 38346470, Mobil: +45 40765300
