Ric Moore wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 22:26 -0400, Jim Cornette wrote: > > >> So I guess I'll make do with Fedora and hope the software and >> preferences that I like are still an interest to include within RHEL. not >> for the sake of RHEL, but as a Fedora user. Quite a few of my favorite >> applications migrated from Fedora Core into Fedora-Extras, sor RHEL >> probably would be too slimmed down for my usage at home. > > One of the swell benefits of being a Beta Tester for RHEL is that when > it's over, the participants get some swag and a new boxed edition of the > Release. Funny, I've never gotten that. > I've gotten several. So, for those on this list that really > need a production server but don't have the scratch for it, this is a > golden opportunity. Yea, because it's not like the sources for RHEL are provided and other projects have sprung up creating distributions from those sources... oh, wait: http://centos.org/ http://whiteboxlinux.org/ > I find for the Defense, that RH can post such opportunities to us here > in the cheap seats That's the point, no one at RH did. They understand that RHEL is off topic here. > and that anyone in need of such shouldn't be cringing in > the corner, afraid to even ask questions concerning RHEL, One shouldn't be afraid to ask questions concerning RHEL... in the RHEL lists. -- William Hooper
