On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 20:50 -0400, William Hooper wrote: > Jim Cornette wrote: > > taharka wrote: > > > > Thanks for mentioning the fact that it might be possible to test RHEL > > beta. Fedora is the testing ground for RHEL, so testing whatever Fedora > > testers have helped refine might be interesting to see how the decided > > choices stack up. > > Anyone interested in the RHEL5 betas would be better served joining the > RHEL5 beta lists, rather than relying on off-topic posts about it here. > And what if *we* want the heads up to remind us of progress? Or what if we are interested but needed a tiny nudge to go look at the other distro produced by RH? At least they are produced by the same company, even if in different formats and with differing goals. As long as the post does not become a blatant plug and advertising scheme for RHEL on this list it is hardly a problem. More advertising has come from your complaints than from the initial post. > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list > General discussion list for testers of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 > (Tikanga) Beta releases. > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-announce > Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) announcement mailing-list > > > One problem with the title for the messages. We are Fedora users, are we > > included in the beta testing or is it just for Red Hat users? > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2006-September/msg00000.html > "This is a public beta. Feel free to forward this announcement to anyone > who may be interested in testing this beta release." > > -- > William Hooper >
