On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 16:39, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On 03/07/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't think I believe the results though. For me it shows > > up to 50% loss at one point yet 0% for many things beyond > > it. That doesn't make a lot of sense because the more distant > > points have to traverse the hop where it claims losses are > > happening. > > Yes, I was seeing that, too. I'd guess it is some kind of rate-limiting firewalling on the ICMP responses if it is even real - something that wouldn't affect normal traffic at all. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
