On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 02:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > As it is now, what is a verifiable claim clearly says that Linux is not > under any sort of modified GPL license. I'm a little confused then. With the kernel memory model that encompasses user space and the FSF claim that everything that runs in the same memory space is derived, doesn't that make it impossible to run any non-GPL'd code without a license violation? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
