On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 22:07 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 20:52, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > On 22Jun2006 09:21, Steven Ringwald <asric@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > | >Your points on licensing are the accurate and worth considering. This > > | >could be the show stopper. > > | > > | Isn't this why modules were introduced into the kernel??? > > > > No. Go look at the linux kernel folks opinions about binary-only modules. > > Why is that relevant? > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/source/ > You know the answer to that. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/licensing_faq/ ... I believe this covers it. http://groups.google.co.il/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/9726be571101d09/27036427257177ed?q=cddl&rnum=1#27036427257177ed Gilboa
