From: "Craig White" <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx>
All that notwithstanding, IP attorneys can be aggressive with opinion
but it is companies and thus the consumer that ultimately pays their
bills and that is perhaps the best argument for GPL since one of the
intentions of the GPL was to level the playing field and permit the
software consumer to own software to the point where they aren't subject
to arbitrary corporate whim or obtuse IP attorneys bills.
That worked REAL well with regards to the SCO attorneys, didn't it?
{^_-}
