Re: FC4 or FC5

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: FC4 or FC5
• From: Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu <m3freak@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 12:56:14 -0400
• In-reply-to: <1150560117.12927.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <BAYC1-PASMTP0933A9CF4F72E85AE26AE2AE830@xxxxxxx> <20060617015838.37546.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAYC1-PASMTP04B7B6DE4094BE180C3AC4AE800@xxxxxxx> <03b601c691be$ee1f24b0$0225a8c0@Wednesday> <1150521433.14925.25.camel@krs> <1150560117.12927.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, 2006-17-06 at 11:01 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
[bunch of stuff cut]

I certainly don't feel restricted.  My clients don't feel restricted.
I think the GPL is great.

If a developer likes the GPL, so be it.  Live and let live.

Regards,

Ranbir

-- 
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.16-1.2111_FC4 i686 GNU/Linux 
12:54:13 up 6:23, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 

• References:
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: Sean
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: BRUCE STANLEY
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: Sean
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: jdow
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: Les Mikesell

• Prev by Date: Can't open any local files with Konqi!
• Next by Date: repo livna : where is kmod-fglrx ?
• Previous by thread: Re: FC4 or FC5
• Next by thread: RE: FC4 or FC5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread